Politics and pedophiles

tap to search
TOP STORIES
CHEAT SHEET
POLITICS
ENTERTAINMENT
WORLD
U.S.
TECH
ARTS + CULTURE
DRINK + FOOD
STYLE
about
THE DAILY BEAST

PHOTO ILLUSTRATION BY BRIGETTE SUPERNOVA/THE DAILY BEAST
THE ONE PERCENT
The Billionaire Pedophile Who Could Bring Down Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton
BRANDY ZADROZNY
06.29.16 10:00 PM ET
Editor's note: This article has been updated to reflect the withdrawal of Virginia Roberts Guiffre's allegations against Alan Dershowitz and the striking of the allegations from the court record by a federal judge.
For Jeffrey Epstein and his famous friends, the Aughts were a simpler time, when the businessmen, academics, and celebrities who counted themselves among the playboy philanthropist’s inner circle could freely enjoy the fruits of his extreme wealth and connections.
Epstein’s little black book and flight logs read like a virtual Who’s Who: Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Larry Summers, Kevin Spacey, Prince Andrew, and Naomi Campbell all hitched rides on Epstein’s private planes. Socialites and distinguished scientists went to visit Epstein’s island in St. Thomas, and cavorted at epic dinner parties at his palatial townhouse—then the largest privately owned residence in New York, as he liked to brag. There, they picked at elaborate meals catered by celebrity chefs like Rocco DiSpirito, marvelled at Epstein’s opulent decor, and noted the pack of very, very young model-types with whom Epstein always seemed to surround himself.

But a darker story was going on underneath the glamour. In 2008, Epstein was convicted of soliciting sex from an underage girl and quietly paid settlements to scores of alleged victims who said he serially molested them. But the girls kept coming out of the woodwork—in 2014, another young woman filed a lawsuit claiming that Epstein used her as a sex slave for his powerful friends—and that she’d been at parties on his private island with former President Clinton.
And just last week, yet another “Jane Doe” filed a suit in New York accusing Epstein and Donald Trump of raping her at a series of sex parties when she was only 13.
Watch: Casey Anthony's Former Lawyer Is Taking On A Rape Case Against Trump
Attorney Cheney Mason helped acquit Casey Anthony. Now, he's signed on to help one of Donald Trump's rape accusers.

Trump has denied Jane Doe’s claims and his reps have said he barely knew Epstein—even though New York media in the ’90s regularly chronicled his comings-and-goings at Epstein’s Upper East Side palace, and even though Epstein had 14 private numbers for Trump and his family in his little black book. Meanwhile, Bill and Hillary Clinton have remained mum about their ties to the Palm Beach pedophile—despite evidence that shows Bill was one of the most famous and frequent passengers on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” and that Epstein donated money to the Clinton Foundation even after his conviction.

For months, talking heads have wondered whether Trump would use Epstein and his girls as a weapon against Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Now, with the latest federal lawsuit against Trump himself, it seems the notorious financier has become a serious liability for both campaigns.
***

Less than a year before Florida police began investigating Jeffrey Epstein for the alleged rape and abuse of scores of young girls, the questionable billionaire responded to a call on Edge—an online club where navel-gazing intellectuals and academics meet to pose questions to one another—for a “bit of wisdom, some rule of nature... that you’ve noticed in the universe that might as well be named after you.”
“Epstein’s First Law,” he wrote, “Know when you are winning.”
“Epstein’s Second Law: The key question is not what can I gain but what do I have to lose.”
GET THE DAILY BEAST IN YOUR INBOX

Enter your email address
SUBSCRIBE
FOLLOW THE DAILY BEAST

What the 63-year-old Ralph Lauren lookalike had to lose was his perverted double life. According to law-enforcement officials and alleged victims, between the years 1998 and 2007—and possibly even earlier—he ran a particularly vile pyramid scheme that involved paying minors around $200 at a time to perform sexual massages nearly every day and then recruit even younger girls to do the same. (“The more you do, the more you are paid,” one said.) During these massages, girls as young as 13 told police they were instructed to get undressed. Epstein would masturbate or penetrate them, they said—with his finger, or a vibrator, or his allegedly egg-shaped penis.
By the time Epstein was arrested in 2008, police in Palm Beach County, Florida, had already spent months monitoring his movements, rifling through his trash, and interviewing potential victims and witnesses. Police reported to prosecutors that they had gathered enough evidence to charge the money manager with several felonies: lewd and lascivious molestation and four counts of unlawful sexual activity with a minor. Epstein’s freedom, his wealth, his little black book full of famous folk—including princes, presidents, and prime ministers—all were seemingly at stake.
So Epstein did what the mega-rich do in these situations: hired star attorneys Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz, who defended their client vigorously, reportedly having witnesses followed and discrediting the alleged victims by offering their MySpace pages as evidence of supposed drug use and scandalous behavior.
Prosecutors said Epstein’s dream team made successful prosecution unlikely. “Our judgment in this case, based on the evidence known at the time, was that it was better to have a billionaire serve time in jail, register as a sex offender, and pay his victims restitution than risk a trial with a reduced likelihood of success,” U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta explained in a 2011 letter.
And so, despite a decade of alleged serial sexual abuse and rape of an unknowable number of girls, some as many as 100 times according to court filings, the notoriously secretive financier was offered a deal. For the alleged systematic victimization of young girls—most of whom were plucked by Epstein’s assistants from Palm Beach’s poorer neighborhoods and groomed to adore or acquiesce to him—he was slapped with a 2008 conviction on a single charge of soliciting a minor; and sentenced to an 18-month stay in a Palm Beach county jail—of which he served only 13 months and was allowed to leave six days out of every week for “work release.” He also agreed to a few dozen confidential, out-of-court payoffs to his accusers, the most recent of which was finalized in 2011.
Epstein’s “potential co-conspirators,” as the U.S. Attorney called them—women who allegedly procured girls for Epstein—also received immunity from prosecution as a condition of the 2007 agreement that enraged the local police force for its leniency. As of 2015, according to The Guardian, two of these women had changed their names, and were operating businesses out of a building owned by Epstein’s brother, where it was alleged in court documents that Epstein had housed young women.
Though Epstein must register as a sex offender for life, and arguably suffer the world’s most revolting Google presence, he has seemingly retained his collection of elite academic and media friends as well as his fortune. Since his release in 2009, Epstein has gone about his business, running a mysterious money management firm (clients unknown, income unknown, investments and activities unknown) from his private 70-acre island in the U.S. Virgin Islands and spending time at his Uptown stone mansion. The palace was gifted to Epstein, some say, by its previous owner—Epstein’s guardian angel and the founder of The Limited Inc., Leslie Wexner.
From his plush perch, Epstein continues to dismiss any notions that he should be viewed as the child rapist that victims and Florida police say he is.
“I’m not a sexual predator, I’m an ‘offender,’” he told the New York Post in 2011, shortly after a New York judge classified him as a level 3 offender, or “a threat to public safety.”
“It’s the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel,” Epstein said.
But for the wealthy and famous in Epstein’s orbit, his conviction has meant suspicion by association.
In December 2014, just as the Palm Beach lawsuits were winding down, another alleged victim emerged and her claims were salacious: Epstein, she said, had loaned her out as an underage sex slave to his famous friends—including Britain’s Prince Andrew and Epstein defense attorney Dershowitz (both men denied the charges). Coming forward in Britain’s Daily Mail in 2011, Virginia Roberts Guiffre—called Jane Doe #3 in a related lawsuit (PDF)—claimed that Epstein and his “girlfriend,” alleged madame Ghislaine Maxwell, forced her to have sex with the pair’s powerful pals and gather intel that Epstein could later use. In court documents, Guiffre testified, “Epstein and Maxwell also told me that they wanted me to produce things for them in addition to performing sex on the men. They told me to pay attention to the details about what the men wanted so I could report back to them.”
Guiffre noted that Epstein appeared to be collecting information on Prince Andrew—particularly on his alleged foot fetish—and claimed, “Epstein also trafficked me for sexual purposes to other powerful men, including politicians and powerful business executives. Epstein required me to describe the sexual events I had with these men presumably so that he could potentially blackmail them. I am still very fearful of these men today.”
A judge threw out Guiffre’s motion in 2015, but Guiffre stands by her claims and is suing Ghislaine Maxwell, whom she claims acted as Epstein’s madam.
Meanwhile, the men named by Guiffre seem eager for her to go away. “It’s as if I’ve been waterboarded for 15 months,” Dershowitz told the Boston Globe after the settlement of a defamation case related to Guiffre’s claims. “This has taken a terrible toll on my family, on my friends…” Buckingham Palace has also denied the allegations against Prince Andrew, calling them “categorically untrue.”
UPDATE: This April, Giuffre's lawyers withdrew her allegations against Dershowitz and said that it was a "mistake" to have filed the accusations in the first place. A federal judge later struck her allegations against Dershowitz from the court record. At Dershowitz's request, Louis Freeh, the former head of the FBI, also conducted an independent investigation of her claims and published a statement noting, "Our investigation found no evidence to support the accusations of sexual misconduct against Professor Dershowitz."
In her lawsuit, Guiffre had claimed that during trips to Epstein’s private island, she'd also encountered another very famous person: former President Bill Clinton. Guiffre alleges the former U.S. president visited Epstein’s “Orgy Island” when there were underage girls present, but added that she never had sex with him and never saw him have sex with any of the young women.
Still, it’s these sorts of allegations that have journalists and Clinton-haters circling. Just last month, pundits on MSNBC’s Morning Joe were speculating about Bill Clinton’s oft-discussed friendship with Epstein and whether it would be the go-to play for a Trump campaign looking to combat Hillary Clinton’s claims that Trump is bad for women.
Requests for comment to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Clinton Foundation were not returned.
The former president, who flew on the “The Lolita Express” at least 26 times from 2001 to 2003, has never addressed his ties with Epstein, a onetime major Democratic donor, according to Federal Election Commission records, who also gave millions to the Clinton Foundation even after his arrest for abusing underage girls. “I invest in people—be it politics or science. It’s what I do,” Epstein has reportedly said to friends.
“There’s a 100 percent chance [Trump] is going there,” said former McCain strategist Steve Schmidt on Morning Joe, referring to Clinton’s friendship with the pervy moneyman.
***
Still, Trump may not want to actually “go there” in light of the new federal lawsuit against him.
Just last week, Trump’s own connections to Epstein made headlines when a Jane Doe claimed that the presumptive Republican nominee and his financier pal raped her on several occasions when she was 13 years old.
The allegations are explosive. And the circumstances surrounding them are very, very strange.
According to the complaint, filed in a Manhattan federal court, one of Epstein’s assistants approached Jane Doe as she waited for a bus at the New York Port Authority terminal and offered the teenager money and contacts that could lead to a modeling contract if she came to a party at Epstein’s house. Jane Doe says she attended several parties at Epstein’s Upper East Side mansion, and supposedly had sexual contact with Donald Trump at four of them. The fourth and final time she attended a party with Trump, she alleges he tied her to a bed with pantyhose, raped her, then beat her and threatened to kill her and her family if she told a soul.
This is the second time the woman has brought a suit against Trump and Epstein. The first, which she filed herself this April in California using the name Katie Johnson, was dismissed for failure to bring a claim under the civil-rights law under which she had filed suit. Calls to the phone number listed on the original suit were never answered, with no way to leave a voicemail. The plaintiff’s reported address in Twentynine Palms was a one-bedroom, one-bath home belonging to 72-year-old David Stacey, who had died on Oct. 9, and public records show no evidence of a Katie Johnson living at the property. Neighbors told RadarOnline that squatters had overrun the home while Stacey was hospitalized, and a real-estate agent reported the home had been turned over to the bank by April.
“The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated,” Trump told RadarOnline, responding to the original lawsuit. “There is absolutely no merit to these allegations. Period.”
The new complaint charges that Trump’s denial amounts to defamation. This time, Johnson also has a declaration from a woman who claims to be a corroborating witness, known in the suit as Tiffany Doe. According to her statement, Tiffany was 22 when she lured Johnson to Epstein’s home and witnessed Johnson’s alleged rape firsthand.
Johnson has a number of non-anonymous supporters, though it’s a cast of characters who do little to allay Trump’s assertion that her claim was brought solely to influence the election.
According to a lengthy article on the site Jezebel, some eight months before Johnson filed her California lawsuit against Epstein and Trump, a man named Al Taylor—who claimed to be the “PR person” for something called the Erotic Heritage Museum in Las Vegas—reached out to a reporter at Gawker to shop a video recording of Johnson and her rape story. Taylor, who identified himself to The Daily Beast as “a friend” to Johnson, claims to have met her at a party where she revealed her alleged childhood assault by Trump. In a video published in part on Jezebel, a woman claiming to be Katie Johnson appears—wearing a blond wig, her face pixelated and her voice disguised. In it, she details the allegations of rape.
When The Daily Beast asked Taylor for a copy of the video, Taylor suggested it was still for sale. “I heard it would be worth $1 million,” Taylor said, claiming the proceeds from the sale would go to Johnson’s protection.
“We’ve got her in hiding,” he said. 
Taylor has coincidentally been the subject of Epstein-related news before. In 2011, Taylor, at first freelance producing for The Jerry Springer Show then working alone, claimed to have made a million-dollar deal with Casey Anthony for an interview after the Florida woman’s acquittal in the murder of her 2-year-old daughter. When the interview didn’t happen, Taylor retained the services of Spencer Kuvin, a Palm Beach lawyer who also represented three Epstein victims. Taylor says he met Kuvin during an attempt to interview his Epstein clients. They settled with Epstein out of court and declined to be interviewed by Taylor.
But Taylor wasn’t the only party working to get the tape and Katie Johnson’s story to the media. According to Jezebel, Steve Baer, described in National Review as “a conservative activist and major, if secretive, donor to the conservative movement,” lobbied their reporter to publish Johnson’s claims. Baer is also, according to Jezebel, the father of Chandler Smith, an Ohio woman who happens to be the co-founder of an organization called Vote Trump Get Dumped, a campaign that urges ladies to withhold sex from Trump supporters. “Until Trump is defeated, we don’t date, sleep with, or canoodle with Trump supporters,” the group’s manifesto reads.
When Johnson’s case was thrown out in California, Taylor says he began looking for an attorney to file a new case for his “friend.” They approached Brad Edwards, the lawyer who has represented a number of Epstein victims through settlements—and who is now representing Virginia Roberts Guiffre in her claim against Epstein’s former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell as well as four alleged victims in the case against the federal government.
“I will say I’ve never represented [Johnson] and I won’t be representing her,” Edwards told The Daily Beast.
Edwards couldn’t comment on the conversations he had with Johnson or her representatives, citing attorney-client privilege. Concerning Trump’s involvement in Epstein’s illicit affairs, Edwards said he hadn’t seen any evidence that would implicate the GOP nominee and described Trump as “extremely helpful and honest,” during questioning.
When Edwards declined to take the case, Taylor told the website GossipExtra they were shopping for representation. That’s how Johnson’s current attorney, Tom Meagher, says he found his client.
Meagher is a patent attorney in New Jersey who openly admits, “I've never taken on accusations like this,” but says he was drawn to Johnson’s story and believes her “100 percent.” In an effort to get media attention for Johnson’s case, Meagher attended a May fundraiser in Lawrenceville, New Jersey—thrown to pay off the debt incurred by Chris Christie’s failed presidential campaign, and one at which Donald Trump spoke. Described as “a protester” by a local reporter, Meagher confirms he was removed by security after holding up a sign that read: “Ask Trump About Katie Johnson.” 
“I don’t have a view on the race,” Meagher now tells The Daily Beast. “I did before the matter, but now I’m apolitical so I can focus on my client.”
Concerning the timing of the lawsuit, Meagher says: “Of course, she does not want her rapist to be president.”
Despite several requests, The Daily Beast was not able to speak with Katie Johnson or Tiffany Doe. When asked whether any evidence of their claims existed outside of the Doe declarations, Taylor said Tiffany kept a journal of Epstein contacts. “She has all the goods,” Taylor said, but would not elaborate and said future names would only be released in response to a scandal on par with Donald Trump’s political ascent.
But Mike Fisten, a retired Miami-Dade homicide detective who worked as a private investigator in several Epstein-related cases, is skeptical about the new claims.
Fisten says Epstein had in effect two lives: “a business life and deviant pedphile life.” To find out which friends were involved in which life, Fisten carried a book with photos of Epstein’s contacts. In hundreds of interviews with hundreds of witnesses, he said no one has ever identified Trump as being involved in any kind of sexual activity with underage girls. In fact, Fisten recalls learning in the early 2000s that members of Trump’s private Palm Beach club, Mar-a-Lago, complained that Epstein was often accompanied by very young girls–“a different girl every week”—each of whom he would refer to as “his niece.” Fisten says he offered to look at Tiffany Doe’s book to vet her free of charge, but Taylor and Meagher declined.
Emails to the Trump Organization and the campaign for this story were not returned, but Trump’s attorney Alan Garten has repeatedly denied any relationship between his client and Epstein, other than Epstein’s Mar-a-Lago membership.
Still, it’s clear that Trump’s association with Epstein runs deeper than just pool days at Mar-a-Lago.
“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years,” Trump told New York Magazine in 2002. Calling him a “terrific guy,” Trump continued, “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it—Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
According to a 2003 profile in Vanity Fair and New York gossip rags that covered the goings-on of Epstein and his famous friends in the late ’90s, Trump would attend dinner parties at the 71st Street mansion. In April 1999, The Mail spotted Trump among the guests at a dinner Epstein threw in honor of Prince Andrew. In 2000, they reported he attended a “hookers and pimps” Halloween party. New York  magazine reported Trump’s attendance at a 2003 dinner party thrown in honor of Bill Clinton. Magician David Blaine entertained the “barely clad models” with card tricks, but Clinton never appeared.
“I often see Donald Trump and there are loads of models coming and going, mostly at night,” a neighbor told The Mail on Sunday in 2000.
Then there is the black book, in which Epstein lists 14 phone numbers for Trump, including ones for his future wife Melania. Police evidence shows Trump has called Epstein, flown on Epstein’s plane, and eaten in Epstein’s Florida home.
Garten did not return a request for comment on these connections.
“Mr. Trump’s only connection with Mr. Epstein was that Mr. Epstein was one of thousands of people who has visited Mar-a-Lago,” the Trump attorney told a BuzzFeed reporter in 2015. “That’s it. Mr. Trump has NEVER been accused of having any involvement or even having any knowledge of any of Mr. Epstein’s conduct by anyone.”
That was true until last week. And while the media has been hesitant to report on Katie Johnson’s accusations, stories have emerged in recent days in outlets like the New York Daily News and Gothamist and more may be in the works: Johnson’s attorney says he taped an interview with ABC News and sources spoken to for this story said they had been contacted by other national news organizations.
Johnson will likely have her day in court, but—perhaps ironically, given Trump’s habit of “just asking” about conspiracy theories while claiming he’s not endorsing them—the veracity of her claims may not matter. True or not, they bring to light a number of disturbing questions about Epstein and his pre-Palm Beach days—ones both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump will likely have to address.                                                              
  & TRADEMARK
© 2016 THE DAILY BEAST COMPANY LLC

Pleasure island

Daily Wire

Both Trump And Clinton Went To Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Slave Island
2016

One Twitter user once asked me, “Is it too much to hope that *one* of our parties would pick someone with no links to a pedophile sex-slave island?”

Apparently, it is too much to ask for.                                            
Both presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and former President Bill Clinton have ties to convicted pedophile and Democratic donor, billionaire Jeffery Epstein and "Sex Slave Island."

Note: President Bill Clinton is not merely the husband of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, either. Bill is currently campaigning for his wife, plus Hillary recently unveiled that Bill with be in charge of “revitalizing the economy” if she were to take office.

It has been uncovered that Clinton, known for his trouble-making libido, has even stronger ties to Epstein than previously reported. As noted by The Free Beacon, “Clinton was aboard the infamous Lolita Express owned by a billionaire pedophile at least 26 times," not the initially reported 11 times.

Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls…Official flight logs filed with the Federal Aviation Administration show Clinton traveled on some of the trips with as many as 10 U.S. Secret Service agents. However, on a five-leg Asia trip between May 22 and May 25, 2002, not a single Secret Service agent is listed.

The Republican presumptive nominee apparently got in on the action, too. Trump’s ties to Epstein — a man Trump once called a “terrific guy” — and Sex Slave Island have been chronicled by The Daily Wire here.

Per The Political Insider, Trump is accused of threatening and raping a 13-year-old girl on the private island. Epstein is also named in the suit for sexual misconduct. The lawsuit accusations have been vehemently denied by the Trump camp, alleging that the filing is a “hoax” and that there is “no evidence” that the plaintiff in question “actually exists.” 

Sex Slave Island, sometimes referred to as “Orgy Island,” (both lovely names), is one deranged place, allegedly rife with solicited sex, often from minors “groomed” by Epstein.

“Terrific guy” Epstein, of course, was convicted for soliciting sex from a minor in 2008; the billionaire served 13 months in prison.

Election 2016: Where both candidates have ties to a convicted pedophile, the Lolita Express and Sex Slave Island. 

TAGS BILL CLINTON DONALD TRUMP HILLARY CLINTON PEDOPHILIA RAPE SEX SEXUAL ASSAULT

YOUTUBE RSS FEED
© COPYRIGHT 2016, THE DAILY WIRE
PRIVACY POLICY   |   TERMS OF USE   |   ADVERTISE WITH US   |   CONTACT US

Florida pests

Follow us on Facebook  Follow us on Instagram 

CSIRO
This deadly flesh-eating parasite is invading the US for the first time in decades
"We had no idea what this thing was."
PETER DOCKRILL 29 NOV 2016
Florida is on high alert after the return of an invasive, flesh-eating parasite that has killed more than 100 deer since July.

The re-emergence of the New World screwworm, which was thought to have been eradicated from the US decades ago, has resulted in an agricultural state of emergency being declared in Monroe County, Florida, as authorities try to contain the outbreak.

The screwworm, so named because its ridges resemble the spiral shape of a screw, is the larvae (maggot) of the Cochliomyia hominivorax fly.

When this species matures, it looks much like a common housefly, but its larvae are especially dangerous.

The larvae infect warm-blooded animals, burrowing into open wounds and feeding on living flesh. People are also at risk from the parasite, although none have been infected in the recent outbreak.

The parasite, which hadn't been seen in Florida for 50 years, was the target of a long-fought eradication campaign starting in the 1930s, which was ultimately deemed successful in 1966.

Since then, local authorities have maintained a biological control called the sterile insect technique, to prevent the screwworm from re-entering the US from South and Central America.

This process involves releasing infertile male flies that have been sterilised by radiation into the wild. Female flies only mate once in their lives, and when they mate with these infertile males, no offspring result, ensuring that the screwworm is bred out of existence in infested areas.

But despite efforts to protect the US from the parasite with ongoing sterile fly barriers at the Darién Gap between Panama and Colombia, the screwworm got back in somehow, turning up in Monroe County in July, where it was reported in wild deer.

The deer species infested, called Key deer, only lives in Florida, and is endangered, with less than 1,000 remaining in the National Key Deer Refuge, run by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

But as if the Key deer didn't have enough problems, the screwworm infestation has seen 132 of these animals killed since July – about 15 percent of the whole population.

"We had no idea what this thing was," ranger Kristie Killam told Frances Robles at The New York Times.

"There was a few here and there in July and August, but it was September, when the rut started, that we started scratching our heads and saying, 'This is a little bit out of the ordinary'," she added. "It looks like a horribly infected wound, an infected wound that never got treated, infected with mushy maggots."

Initially mistaking the parasite wounds for regular flesh wounds caused by deer fighting, the rangers weren't aware of the deadly pest in their midst, which also infected two cats, a dog, and a pig.

But lab tests run in September confirmed the outbreak was indeed screwworms, with Florida declaring an agricultural state of emergency in October.

The good news is that protection measures to stem the outbreak – including sterile flies, a quarantine area, and anti-parasitic medications – appear to be working.

The US Fish & Wildlife Service announced last week that the deer population seems to have stabilised at 875, with no new deaths in a week – the first time this has happened since the outbreak began.

While any warm-blooded animals are susceptible to screwworms, the real threat is to agriculture – although there's also a rare but potential risk to humans.

Since the eradication in the 1960s, only sporadic instances of screwworm infections in the US have occurred – usually isolated cases of infected travellers returning from other countries.

One of these cases involved a 12-year-old girl who had travelled with her family to Colombia, then complained of extreme pain in her scalp upon returning home to Connecticut.

Doctors eventually removed 142 screwworm larvae from her head, resorting to using "bacon therapy" – luring the parasites out with pieces of meat placed over the worms.

Efforts to contain the latest outbreak are expected to continue well into 2017, and hopefully we'll have new information soon to show us that infection counts are dropping – as this nightmarish parasite is the last thing the world needs right now.

  by Taboola Sponsored Links YOU MAY LIKE
7 Steps That Help Your Finances Get Back on Track
Citi
Android? Get Connected: Explore the Latest Android Phones
YourElectronicsGuide - Search
What Xena Warrior Princess Looks Like Now Is Crazy
FeelsYoung
Jaw-Dropping News Anchors From Around The World - Wait til you see #1!
Mentertained
Thinking Of Buying A New Couch? Go To This Site First
Wayfair
Do You Come From Royal Blood? Your Last Name May Tell You.
Ancestry

  Sponsored Links PARTNER CONTENT
Scientists Think They’ve Found the Key to Living Over 100
Keio Research Highlights
China Wants to Build Its Own Super Collider – But Not Everyone's Impressed
Nature Index
A New Australian City Is Emerging as an Unexpected Leader in Science
Nature Index
More From ScienceAlert
Scientists have found the world's largest cluster of sinkholes, and it spans 4 counties
Scientists have found the world's largest cluster of sinkholes, and it spans 4 counties
This is crazy.

13 hours ago Share Icon

Researchers discover a totally unexpected behaviour of water inside carbon nanotubes
Researchers discover a totally unexpected behaviour of water inside carbon nanotubes
Water does very strange things in small spaces.

14 hours ago Share Icon
Scientists have found the largest exposed fault on Earth
Scientists have found the largest exposed fault on Earth
Running through the notorious Ring of Fire.

15 hours ago Share Icon
Scientists are turning nuclear waste into super-efficient diamond batteries
Scientists are turning nuclear waste into super-efficient diamond batteries
With a half-life of 5,730 years.

16 hours ago Share Icon

Space could leave you blind, and scientists say they've finally figured out why
Space could leave you blind, and scientists say they've finally figured out why
20/20 to 20/100 in 6 months.

19 hours ago Share Icon
The Great Barrier Reef has suffered the worst die-off ever recorded
The Great Barrier Reef has suffered the worst die-off ever recorded
Damn it, 2016.

20 hours ago Share Icon
Scientists have revealed the deadly physics of Boston’s molasses tsunami of 1919
Scientists have revealed the deadly physics of Boston’s molasses tsunami of 1919
What nightmares are made of.

18 hours ago Share Icon

  LOAD MORE

autistic and pesticides l inks

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Vaccine

Mercola.com

    7
    0
    Email to a friend Email

View All Health Topics

End Pharma Liability Shield Endangering Public Health and Human Rights
November 17, 2016 | 15,716 views
Visit the Mercola Video Library
Story at-a-glance -

    Banning vaccine injury lawsuits has guaranteed drug companies unlimited profit-making in a stable, liability-free market for old and new vaccines recommended and mandated by government
    $3.5 billion has been awarded to more than 3,500 vaccine victims — mostly adults — through the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP); two-thirds of all claims are denied
    There should be no liability shield for any industry making products used by humans, especially those mandated by government for use by everyone

By Barbara Loe Fisher

Another sign that autonomy and civil liberties are being threatened in America is the recently proposed change to public health law published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).1

This allows federal officials to use police power to apprehend, isolate and involuntarily quarantine travelers simply suspected of being at risk for getting measles or other infections until they sign a contract agreeing to application of “public health measures,” like vaccination.

A big reason they can get away with it is that nobody is accountable in a civil court of law when people are harmed by public health laws. Curbing civil liberties under the guise of protecting the public health and national security has become big business.

In 1982, when the pharmaceutical industry threatened to stop producing government-licensed and recommended vaccines for children unless vaccine manufacturers got a product liability shield, Congress gave Big Pharma most of what it wanted in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.2

It was tort reform legislation sold to parents and the American public on the backs of children legally required by states to get federally recommended vaccines to attend school.3

Even though by November 1, 2016, $3.5 billion had been awarded to more than 3,500 vaccine victims through the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) created under the 1986 law,4 2 out of 3 claims have been denied throughout the entire history of the law’s implementation.5

Most of the compensation awards today are for adults injured by flu vaccine — not for children required to get vaccines to go to school.6,7 

While the government denies compensation to many children whose lives have been destroyed by state mandated vaccines, in the past five years, liability-free drug companies have joined forces with politically powerful medical trade groups to change state vaccine laws.

They are lobbying state legislatures to severely restrict the medical exemption and eliminate the non-medical religious, philosophical and conscientious belief exemptions for children attending school.8
NVIC Calls for Vaccine Reaction Witnessing and Return to Civil Liability for Vaccine Manufacturers

On the 30th Anniversary of the enactment of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act on November 15, 1986, the nonprofit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has renewed our call for a return to product liability for pharmaceutical companies.

We also are calling for a return to civil liability for doctors and other vaccine administrators shielded by law from malpractice lawsuits when they negligently administer a vaccine.

To highlight the fact that the Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has protected the pharmaceutical and medical trade industries but done nothing to protect the lives of children, during Vaccine Awareness Week (Nov. 13 to Nov. 19, 2016), NVIC has:

• Launched a video vaccine reaction reporting feature on NVIC’s online International Memorial for Vaccine Victims called “Protect Life: Witness A Vaccine Reaction on NVIC.org.”

Now you can post a two- to six-minute video describing how your life or the life of a loved one has been forever changed by a serious vaccine reaction here, where it will be permanently archived and shared with the millions of visitors to NVIC’s website for many years to come.

Or you can search the database of photos and vaccine reaction descriptions on the Memorial for Vaccine Victims dedicated to remembering those for whom the risks of vaccination were 100 percent.

• Published a 90-page legislative policy analysis of scientific, economic, legal, ethical and political questions about proposed legislation in Virginia to eliminate medical and religious vaccine exemptions.

View or download this fully referenced analysis from NVIC.org here and learn how to educate your own state legislators about protecting exemptions in vaccine laws.

• Translated NVIC’s three most popular vaccine information brochures into Spanish, which you can view or download from NVIC.org here.

VAW (Vaccine Awareness Week) 2016, which is co-sponsored by Mercola.com and NVIC, will also feature a free viewing of the award winning documentary, “The Greater Good,” on Mercola.com running Saturday, November 19 through Friday, November 25. 
National and Global Public-Private Partnerships Capture Populations

The assault on health freedom in America has been fueled by a lucrative public-private partnership forged by government with the pharmaceutical industry that was expanded after 1986.9,10

Big Pharma spends more money lobbying on Capitol Hill influencing lawmakers than any other industry,11 and growing the business of vaccination is part of the political agenda.12 This public-private business partnership was greatly strengthened after 9/11.13

Congress passed legislation giving more power to the executive branch and billions of dollars to the Departments of Health and Human Services, Defense and Homeland Security14,15,16 following allegations that terrorist groups had weapons of mass destruction, specifically biological weapons, that required the development of many new vaccines to protect “national security.” 

More liability protection for companies making and selling vaccines was thrown in for good measure17 to accelerate new vaccine development.18,19,20,21 A lot of money is being spent to grow the business of vaccination in America and around the world.

However, the threat to autonomy and civil liberties would not be as great today if multi-national pharmaceutical corporations, government agencies and individuals creating, producing, selling, licensing, recommending, mandating and giving vaccines could be held legally accountable in a civil court of law when vaccines injure and kill people.

Americans are not the only ones being subjected to the control and profit-making agenda of business partnerships between industry and government.

As the recent November 4, 2016 Presidential Executive Order on the Global Health Security Agenda reveals, the U.S. is one of many nations participating in global public-private partnerships.22

Financial deals between governments, Big Pharma and Big Philanthropy are capturing populations in countries around the world where, like in the U.S., governments have let industry off the hook for vaccine injuries and deaths.23,24

This greases the skids for development of new vaccines to advance a global health agenda that often frames infectious diseases in military terms as a “security threat.”25,26
A David and Goliath Battle Then and Now

The people versus Big Pharma has always been a David and Goliath battle. In the 1970s and early ‘80s, when children were only required to get DPT, oral polio and MMR vaccines to go to school,27 vaccine injury lawsuits in the U.S. against wealthy drug companies dragged on for years and parents spent tens of thousands of dollars trying to get help for their vaccine-damaged children.

Back then, the vast majority of product liability lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers (and malpractice lawsuits against negligent pediatricians) did not end with multi-million dollar verdicts, but were settled at the last minute on the courthouse steps by plaintiff and defense attorneys for low amounts of money before the case could get to the jury.

Most of the time, vaccine manufacturers insisted that one condition of settlement was that all court records and evidence found during discovery would be sealed from public view.

When the VICP was being developed in a series of proposed bills between 1983 and 1986, parents were told that — unlike a lengthy, expensive and traumatic lawsuit against rich and powerful pharmaceutical companies — the federal vaccine injury compensation process would be “non-adversarial.”

Parents were promised that the “administrative” alternative to a civil court lawsuit that Congress was proposing would be a “safety net” and provide compensation to vaccine injured children “quickly, easily and with certainty and generosity.”28

It turns out that was a lie.29 Over the past 30 years, federal agencies and the U.S. Court of Claims have been allowed to turn the process of obtaining federal compensation into a cruel imitation of a court trial without a jury. As a 2014 Government Accountability Report (GAO) report pointed out, VICP cases drag on for years while families suffer.30

Through federal tax dollars and fees to doctors giving children vaccines and insurance premiums, all U.S. citizens pay into the Vaccine Injury Trust Fund that is supposed to be there to provide financial support to human casualties of federal vaccine polices and state vaccine laws.

Yet, today, when parents follow doctors’ orders and obey state vaccine mandates and their children are harmed, the majority of vaccine injured children and their families are left out in the cold with nothing, even though there is a $3.6 billion surplus sitting in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund.31
Vaccine Safety Provisions in 1986 Law Are Not Enforced

After Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA), Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA), Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and other influential members of Congress informed parents they were going to pass tort reform legislation to protect the nation’s childhood vaccine supply, as one of NVIC’s co-founders I worked to help secure mandatory informing, reporting and recording safety provisions in the 1986 law.

Little did we know that Congress would fail to make sure the safety provisions included in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act were enforced.

Today, pediatricians and other medical workers giving vaccines to children are free to ignore their duty to identify and help prevent vaccine reactions. In congressional testimony and public comments to federal agencies over the past two decades, NVIC has been highly critical of the VICP and the failure of government to enforce the law’s vaccine safety provisions.32,33

In contrast to sanctions placed on Americans when they do not comply with government vaccine recommendations and mandates, there are no legal sanctions for vaccinators who refuse to obey the 1986 law’s vaccine safety provisions to:

    Provide parents with written vaccine and disease information BEFORE children are vaccinated
    Record serious health problems following vaccination in the permanent medical record
    Report serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following vaccination to the federal vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS)

All of the promises made by the 1986 Congress to parents have been broken. In large part, the law is a dismal failure because subsequent Congresses have not provided strong oversight on the law’s implementation. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Justice and U.S. Court of Claims have had a free hand in gutting the Vaccine Injury Table34 and restricting the ability of the vaccine injured to be compensated.35,36
US Supreme Court Bans Vaccine Design Defect Lawsuits

Banning vaccine injury lawsuits has certainly guaranteed drug companies unlimited profit-making in a stable, liability-free market for old and new vaccines recommended and mandated by government. The U.S. Supreme Court majority sealed that sweet deal for Big Pharma in 2011 when, as dissenting justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg so accurately pointed out, it ignored the legislative history of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth.37

That legislative history clearly demonstrated that the 1986 Congress intended the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) to be an administrative alternative to a civil lawsuit and not an “exclusive remedy” for children injured by government mandated vaccines.38 Parents were supposed to be able to sue vaccine manufacturers on behalf of their injured children if their federal compensation claim was denied or if there was evidence the company could have made the vaccine less reactive.

Regardless, in a split 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that FDA licensed vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” and extended liability protection to design defect cases — even when there is evidence that a drug company could have made a vaccine less reactive.

Ignoring the pleas of parent and consumer groups, who begged the justices to preserve at least some legal accountability for drug companies making and selling government mandated vaccines,39 the Court majority instead sided with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and a host of medical trade groups allied with government and industry.

These groups included the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Medical Association, American Public Health Association, Pediatric Infectious Disease Society and more that all urged the Supreme Court to absolve pharmaceutical companies of remaining liability for harm caused by vaccines.40

The Supreme Court ruling removed any remaining incentive for pharmaceutical companies to improve the safety of vaccines, as well as removed any incentive for the U.S. government to award federal vaccine injury compensation to prevent the filing of vaccine injury lawsuits.
Pharma and Medical Trade Lobby to Eliminate Vaccine Exemptions

Emboldened by the blank check given to them in 2011 by the Supreme Court,41 drug companies joined with the same public health and medical trade groups that had lobbied Congress and the Supreme Court to ban vaccine injury lawsuits and descended on state legislatures to convince legislators to strip exemptions from U.S. vaccine laws.42

Their goal has been transparent all along: legally force all Americans, young and old alike, to purchase and use liability-free vaccines or face societal sanctions such as loss of an education, medical care, health insurance and employment.43 In 2015, despite strong public opposition, California lost the personal belief vaccine exemption for religious and conscientiously held beliefs and Vermont lost the philosophical belief exemption.44

In many other states in 2015 to 2016, parent and health freedom groups worked with NVIC through the NVIC Advocacy Portal to push back and defeat bills proposing to eliminate vaccine exemptions in Washington, Colorado, Texas, Hawaii, Oregon, Oklahoma, Maine, North Carolina, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.45
Per Child Vaccine Costs Skyrocket Since 1986

Since the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was signed into law by President Reagan on November 15, 1986, the U.S. has guaranteed unlimited profit-making for the pharmaceutical industry that is developing scores of new genetically engineered vaccines,46 but it has not controlled wildly escalating costs to give children every dose of every federally recommended vaccine.

When industry was blackmailing Congress to give them a liability shield in the early 1980s, they told Congress that if their litigation costs to fight vaccine injury lawsuits were eliminated, childhood vaccine prices would be significantly reduced and contained. That was another lie.

In 1986, it cost $80 for a child to receive all federally recommended childhood vaccines in a private pediatrician’s office.47 According to the CDC, the cost to vaccinate one child with every recommended vaccine at federal contract prices rose over 2,300 percent between 1990 and 2012 — from $70 to $1,700 per child.48

By October 2016, the per-child vaccination cost at federal contract prices was $2,130, and for a child to get every dose of every federally recommended vaccine in a private pediatrician’s office, it cost $3,035.49

With no liability, and with federal recommendations and state mandates guaranteeing a predictable market, why does chickenpox vaccine cost up to $115 per dose, meningococcal vaccine up to $120 per dose, pneumococcal vaccine up to $160 per dose and HPV vaccine up to $193 per dose?

In the past 30 years, depending upon the payer, there has been a staggering 2,900 to 3,700 percent increase in the cost to purchase all the federally recommended vaccines for a child in America. Administrative costs have to be added on top of that. These are costs borne by parents, federal taxpayers and the states.
Global Vaccine Market Worth to Double by 2021

The U.S. has the third largest population in the world — 320 million people — and ours is the No. 1 purchaser of pharmaceutical products. Partially removing product liability for vaccine injuries and deaths in 1986 and, essentially, completely removing liability in 2011, have helped to create a global preventive vaccine market of $27.5 billion USD in 2015, which is projected to double to $55 billion by 2021.

Pfizer, Merck & Co, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline and Emergent Biosolutions dominate the business with close to 120 new human vaccines being developed and scheduled to enter the global market within five years.50 The explosive growth in the vaccine market is fueled in no small part by the public-private business partnership between federal agencies and Big Pharma.

This means that vaccine manufacturers don’t have to lobby very hard to get every new vaccine they develop (like hepatitis B, chickenpox, rotavirus, pneumococcal, HPV and meningococcal vaccines) recommended by the CDC for “universal” use by all children (code word for targeted state mandated use for school attendance) so drug companies won’t be liable for any injuries and deaths caused by the new vaccine under the 1986 law.

And when most states dutifully add the new vaccine to the school mandate list, it creates a permanent liability-free market for companies.
Child Vaccinations Triple; Chronic Disease Epidemic Grows Since 1986

But what has happened to the health of children in America since the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was passed in 1986? After drug companies, pediatricians and all vaccine providers were shielded from accountability and liability for vaccine injuries and deaths, U.S. health officials tripled the numbers of vaccinations recommended for children.

The list jumped from 23 doses of seven vaccines in 1986 to 33 doses of nine vaccines by 1997, which has escalated to a current 69 doses of 16 vaccines.51,52  States also increased the number of vaccinations required for children to attend school and, by 1997, it was obvious that a growing number of highly vaccinated children in America were never well anymore.53

The new and unprecedented child chronic disease and disability epidemic that has perfectly coincided with the expansion of the child vaccine schedule over the past 30 years is having a devastating effect on children, their families and our nation.

Today, 1 child in 6 in the U.S. is learning disabled;54 1 in 9 has asthma;55,56 1 in 10 has ADHD;57 1 in 50 develops autism;58 and 1 in 400 has diabetes.59 Millions more are suffering with severe allergies,60,61 epilepsy,62,63 anxiety and depression64,65,66 and other kinds of brain and immune disorders marked by chronic inflammation in the body.67,68,69,70,71
Infant Mortality Rates High and Maternal Mortality Higher Than in 1986

The U.S. has maintained one of the world’s highest child vaccination rates and lowest infectious disease rates,72 even as public health officials have been unable to explain why so many of today’s highly vaccinated children are so sick and disabled. Also unexplained is why America has the worst infant mortality rate of all developed nations, with 6 out of 1,000 babies dying before their first birthday.73,74,75

In addition, maternal mortality in the U.S. has also become one of the worst of all industrialized nations, with between 12 and 28 women in 100,000 dying within one year of giving birth, a maternal mortality rate that more than doubled between 1990 and 2013. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), annually an estimated 1,200 women in America suffer fatal complications during pregnancy and childbirth and another 60,000 suffer near-fatal complications.76

Women having babies in the U.S. today, who represent the most vaccinated generations in our nation’s history, are now also being given influenza, diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccines during pregnancy, a federal maternal vaccination policy that was launched in 1997 with administration of influenza vaccine during any trimester77 and was widened in 2011 with the addition of a pertussis-containing Tdap shot after 20 weeks gestation.78

As of 2015, about half of the nation’s pregnant women, or nearly 2 million women,79 were either vaccinated with Tdap vaccine during pregnancy (42 percent)80,81 or influenza vaccine before or during pregnancy (50 percent)82 or received both vaccines.
Industries Making People Sick: The Perfect Storm

Obviously, the expansion of the childhood vaccine schedule and routine vaccination of pregnant women since 1986 cannot be the sole reason that America has a failing public health report card. GMO food, fluoridated drinking water, mercury amalgams, pesticides, abuse of drugs (legal and illegal) and other toxic environmental exposures are all contributing to the poor health of the U.S. population.

Many health problems can be traced back to chemical, pharmaceutical and medical trade industries, which profit from sickness but are rarely held accountable in a court of law for sickness they cause.
A Public Health Crisis and Human Rights Threat

There should be no liability shield for any industry making products that are used by humans, especially products mandated by government for use by everyone. There should be no liability shield for professions promoting and administering products that can injure and kill, especially when people are forced to use the product or lose the right to an education, medical care, health insurance and employment.

Without corporate, professional and personal accountability or liability for causing harm to others, medical policies and public health laws that lack informed consent protections and require people to risk their lives violate human rights and become a threat to the public health.

    7
    0
    Email to a friend Email

[+] Sources and References
Post your comment
[+] Comments (16)
Previous Article
Next Article
Most Popular
1
Top Vitamin and Mineral Deficiencies — Are You at Risk?
2
Forced Vaccination: the Tragic Legacy of Jacobson v. Massachusetts
3
Broccoli May Slow Age-Related Decline and Promote Longevity by Reducing Chronic Health Risks
4
Freedom of Thought and Religious Beliefs Are Under Attack
5
If Common Chemicals Harm Frogs and Rats, What Are They Doing to Your Children?
You Might Also Like

    While Mandatory Vaccination Laws Are Enacted, Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Is Failing
    While Mandatory Vaccination Laws Are Enacted, Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Is Failing
    240,562 Views

    Use of Prescription Drugs
    What Whistleblowers Tell Us About Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness
    423,745 Views

    Why Are Vaccine Rights Being Removed While Safety Issues Are Increasingly Brought to the Fore?
    Why Are Vaccine Rights Being Removed While Safety Issues Are Increasingly Brought to the Fore?
    213,485 Views

Subscribe to The World's #1 Natural Health Website†

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

If you want to use an article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.

†The World's #1 Natural Health Website claim is based upon Alexa Natural Health Website rankings.

© Copyright 1997-2016 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.

    Mercola Health Resources, LLC BBB Business Review
    McAfee SECURE sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams
    TRUSTe online privacy certification
    Click to Verify - This site has chosen a GeoTrust SSL Certificate to improve Web site security
    Privacy Policy

Ganstalking victims story

I do not yet know how the perpetrators of the  electronic and mind control assault “hooked” my brain by remote; however, I  suspect that I was implanted with a microchip or several microchips over the  years. I have had many inoculations, much dental work, and several minor medical  procedures performed in various locations. Locating the microchips is a major  problem, for they can be inserted in any part of the body, either only slightly  below the surface of the skin or very deep into the muscle tissue. I have  determined that there are probably nineteen or twenty locations on and in my  body where microchips could have been implanted.

Not being able to pin down the location makes finding  the devices much more difficult. In addition, if doctors know that a victim  wants an x-ray, CT Scan, or MRI to look for a microchip, they will not write  orders for those searches. In fact, they will ordinarily advise the authorities  of your purpose in wanting those pictures, in effect suggesting that you are  paranoid schizophrenic.

As the reader will later see, whatever method was  used to “hook” my brain had been employed in my case perhaps by the early- or  mid-1970s and no later than the mid-1980s. More recently, I have recalled  conditions and events that indicate that I could have been targeted even in the  early 1960s. If the latter date proves correct, it would probably implicate the  military doctors and other military medical personnel who gave me shots and  inoculations when I served in the Active Army Reserves in 1961. I used to wonder  how our U.S. rescue forces were able locate lost servicemen who had become  separated from their units during a battle. The capability of locating those  disoriented troops suggests that all servicemen are routinely microchipped upon  entry.

Theories of Methods Used in  ESMC

We know that electronic and mind control assault  operates by remote, but we know little about its delivery system. The delivery  has to be either satellite-driven, land-based, or a combination of the two. The  debate about which one it is goes on. Likewise, there is still some question  about whether the delivery system requires a device implanted in the human body  or can be delivered without that implanted device.

“Remote” means that some object is used to make  contact with the human body over a distance through the air. Whatever is beamed  into the body does not waft aimlessly through space but follows a line of  trajectory, or a frequency. Anything that makes a sound or a movement creates a  frequency. There are thousands, probably millions, of frequencies. Almost  anything today can be controlled by remote using particular radio frequencies.

Today remote-controlled objects are also used in  guiding satellites and unmanned space ships, sending and operating military spy  drones, changing TV functions, opening garage doors, turning on light switches,  and working almost any other motorized or electrical object. It would be  difficult today for an American to live without remote devices.

Electromagnetism may play a role in the targeting. A  field of electromagnetism seems to envelope the target’s surroundings. In my  case, it appears to cover my house and the pastures and fields immediately  around it, as whenever I am outside, the handlers’ voices, or V2K, come through  stronger and clearer. Once again, we do not know whether that electromagnetic  field is projected by satellite, from a land site, or from a hidden device in or  near the victim’s house. Notwithstanding, what if there were some type device  that could make contact with that electromagnetic field that surrounds the  target and then operate within that field to attack us along our particular  brain frequencies? If that were true, distance would be no object and a person  could be pinpointed among several nearby people for electronic assault.

Satellites now possess amazing capabilities, all  performed by remote, and they may very well be utilized in electronic assaults  and mind control. In a 2003 article called Shocking Menace of Satellite  Surveillance, John Fleming wrote about the use of satellites in ESMC  assault. Discussing the realities of satellite-driven ESMC, Fleming said: “The  victim’s movements will be known, his conversations heard, his thoughts picked  clean, and his whole life subjected to bogus moralizing, should his tormentor  diabolically use the information gained. A sadist could harass his target with  sound bites, or audio messages, directly broadcast into his room; with physical  assault with a laser; with subliminal audio messages that disturb his sleep or  manipulate persons around him into saying something that emotionally distresses  him . . . .”

The satellite-guided GPS almost certainly figures  somehow in the electronic assault and mind control activities. Programs such as  Google Earth can locate and zoom in on houses and other objects on maps. That a  victim can be targeted regardless of his location and movement argues that a  satellite is very likely involved. For a satellite to be able to follow and  pinpoint the target wherever he goes, however, probably requires an object, a  substance, or a special condition in the target’s body or, as suggested above, a  device that can operate within and upon the electromagnetic field around the  target. The voices that many targets hear may be piggybacked over the GPS into  that electromagnetic field. Targets know that the intelligence community and  other agencies possess through-the-wall surveillance capability.

If satellites are used, distance is no object. Our  torture could be carried out from other countries just as easily as from the  United States. China, India, Israel, Russia, and other countries possess that  capability. Consider the use of drones in warfare. Today (November, 2009), the  United States often sends drones, or unidentified aerial vehicles (UAVs), to  strike targets in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Forward observers identify the  target, get permission to call in, and then communicate with the drone  operators. Those drones are guided by computer software by remote from  facilities in the United States, notably Fort Meade, Maryland, from thousands of  miles away through the GPS with pinpoint precision.

The use of satellites, however, does not prove that  the attacks come from a great distance. Satellites can also be used along with  the GPS from nearby. Handlers who live near targets can utilize satellites and  the satellite-driven GPS, using the same devices and methods, just as easily as  handlers who operate thousands of miles away. Information concerning weaponry  capable of being used by satellite for physical and neurological torture is  purposely vague about distances. Eventually we shall know from what range our  handlers operate. It will probably vary from case to case. Many targets believe  that our electronic harassment comes from U. S. Government facilities near  Fairbanks, Alaska called High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or  simply HAARP.

This paper does not explore in depth the methods used  to zero in on a person body and mind by remote. There are many schools of  thought on that subject. Here are some of them.

One theory believes that one’s voice can be recorded,  transferred to a computer, and the computer then used to locate the particular  voice and lock onto that voice’s brain. Experiments show that that can indeed be  done. Voices give off distinct vibrations that are as peculiar to a person as  his fingerprints and DNA. One day when the handlers were vibrating me  mercilessly, I tensed my throat, and the vibrations stopped.

That caused me to remember an incident that occurred  when I served in Africa in the 1980s. One day while working in my office, the  secretary from the embassy political section, the office that serves as a front  for our CIA agents, called me to ask some question that anyone could have  answered. I hardly knew the caller; thus, I instantly realized that the real  purpose of her call was to record my voice.

However, I believed that it was probably for security  purposes in case of kidnapping or being held hostage at some point. Voices are  very distinctive, and they can certainly be used to distinguish one voice from  another. That our intelligence community was recording voices in the 1980s makes  me believe that there may be some validity to the theory that perpetrators of  ESMC may be able to “hook” our brains, or at least determine our locations, by  zeroing in on our voices.

Some evidence also suggests that targets’ minds can  be “hooked” if the handlers know the targets’ DNA. If that is true, targets  would not necessarily have to have a microchip or other object or substance in  his body to be hooked. There may be some remote device that with the aid of the  GPS will locate a person and “hook” him using his DNA. If DNA can be utilized,  society is in deep trouble, for obtaining DNA samples of people is a very simple  matter. Even touching a glass or a can will leave useable traces of DNA.

It is reported that since 1979 all hospitals in the  United States have been required to send DNA samples of all babies born in the  U. S. to the Federal Government. I do not know the office or agency that is  supposed to keep that data. If that information is true, it adds credence to DNA  perhaps being involved in ESMC.

Still another theory talks about small devices  (nano-microchips) made so small that they can fit between molecules of water and  other liquids and be injected into the body in shots and inoculations. Patents  taken out by scientists describe that very procedure. Those same nano-microchips  can probably also be swallowed in food and beverages, attaching themselves to  the lining of the stomach.

There is also evidence that even human breath or  breathing somehow figures in electronic torture and mind control. Every  movement, even breathing, gives off a frequency. I later found out that when I  hold my breath for a few seconds, the vibrations temporarily cease. Yet, we do  not know whether breathing in itself has any connection with “hooking” a  target’s brain. The breathing theory does not explain how a target can be  pinpointed while in the close presence of others.

In addition, MRI and other machines have been  successfully combined with computers and used by remote along radio frequencies  to move digits and limbs, detect emotions, and “detect lying, racism, and even  identify which image a person is looking at, suggesting [that] one could  visualize scenes from a person’s dreams or memory” (Hospital Soup.com, June 10,  2008). The uses of a device such as that are endless if used on the brain’s wave  lengths or frequencies. Yet, those actions require an implant in the person on  whom the actions are performed.

Similarly, neurotransmitters can be used by remote to  communicate with brain cells through electrical impulses. That device can tap  into the brain’s functions that cause body movement, thought, feelings  (emotions), and communication. It could probably also influence the thalamus, or  the inner part of the brain, which regulates body temperature and controls urges  such as eating, sleeping, and sexual behavior, all of which figure among many  targets’ ESMC effects.

Laser guns may play a role in ESMC. A CNN news  program on February 23, 2009, reported that 148 incidents of lasers aimed at  airplanes had already been reported since the beginning of the year. In the last  incident, the laser was green in color and about the size of a pencil. If a  laser beam can be focused to such a fine point over several miles of distance,  imagine what it could do when trained on an individual or an object from a  closer distance over a period of time.

Mounting evidence suggests that a substance or an  object can also be introduced sexually into a target’s body to “hook” his or her  brain. Several of my correspondents mention that their ESMC began after having  had an intimate relationship with somebody. Those relationships may have been  set-ups. Spies and undercover agents have used sex for centuries to entrap  individuals. Some such object (nano-microchips) or substance could possibly be  introduced into targets vaginally, orally, or anally through sexual contact.

Some targets believe that the perpetrators’ device  enters through the targets’ eyes to carry out the electronic attacks on the  targets’ bodies. Presumably that would happen after the targets are already “hooked.” One target whom I know wears professional goggles that she says help  keep out the light used by the assailants. Another target also believes that he  is attacked using light. He describes the lights as very bright street lamp-type  elevated lights that seem to rotate. He believes that his attackers piggyback  their laser, or whatever the remote device might be, on the beams of light.

Remote cognitive neural monitoring is one of the most  recent theories. That theory has the targets’ minds being located and “hooked” using some type frequency by remote that somehow connects with the brain without  anything being implanted in the targets. I believe that theory is pure  disinformation, disseminated by the very elements who are carrying out the  remote torture. Why do I believe that? Use your brain. If it were that simple to “hook” a person’s brain, all the drug lords and pushers, heads of crime  syndicates, crooked politicians, white collar crooks, prostitutes, child porn  makers and distributors, foreign and domestic terrorists, bank robbers,  embezzlers, money launderers, and other criminals would already have been caught  and sent to prison. That has not happened; therefore, in my opinion, that  theory, which has caught on in the targeted community and is believed by many  targets, is not valid. Let me repeat: remote cognitive neural monitoring, in my  opinion, is not a valid theory.

Other theories include wiring in the ear that  connects with the brain and pins that penetrate the skull. If those ideas are  valid, the procedures would have to be done in medical facilities or at least  while the target is under sedation. If true, this further indicts the medical  community for its complicity in electronic and mind control assault.

All that said, pick a theory. In truth, we do not yet  actually know how high-tech assailants can focus on a single individual and  capture that person’s mind; neither do we know what instruments are used in the  process. Both are highly guarded secrets shrouded in deception. In fact, there  may be several methods of “hooking” the target as well as several methods of  administering the electronic and mind control effects. However, the only proven  method thus far is through implanted microchips.

Whatever device is used to “hook” the brain, it has  the capability of using that system on diverse targets in a variety of  circumstances in all types of locations. A super computer necessarily has to be  used along with the device, and that computer uses programs with an amazing  range of capabilities. Only the government, research institutions, and  mega-businesses and organizations would probably be able to own such computers  and be able to acquire some of the more sophisticated computer programs. We  shall later see some of its capabilities and the effects they have on the human  body and mind.

Although I cannot prove it and although I possess  little technical expertise, here is what I believe. The attackers use two  different methods, one for the V2K and another one for the array of physical  effects they are able to cause the body. The V2K is projected to targets via the  use of directed sound and GPS, and the physical effects by software used in  conjunction with implants. Both require frequencies. However, in my opinion,  without an implant, targets cannot receive the continual V2K. There is no way  for attackers to focus on targets with V2K regardless of where targets go, even  using satellite GPS, without their being some type of object in the human body  to receive the signals. I further believe that any other method disseminated  over the internet is probably disinformation coming directly from the perps.

Microchips, the Most Plausible Agent for  Targeting

The only proven method of “hooking” a target’s brain  is through surreptitiously implanting a microchip or a nano-microchip in the  target’s body. Scores of patents dealing with microchips in the human body and  operated by remote have indeed been filed, many of which, in the wrong hands,  could be utilized for electronic abuse. I have read of only two persons who  supposedly located microchips in their bodies, had them surgically removed, and  then had them identified. My efforts to contact those individuals failed;  however, their cases are well documented. I know other targets who have located  foreign objects in their bodies but have not been able to find surgeons who  would remove them. We know that many forms of microchips have been developed for  the human body for many purposes, all of them capable of being controlled by  remote.

If indeed microchips turn out to be instrumental in a  target’s electronic assault and mind control, it directly implicates the medical  profession. Only persons in the medical field, intelligence agents, and perhaps  law enforcement are able legally to acquire microchips. Those microchips had to  have been implanted at some point by a dentist, a doctor, an anesthesiologist, a  nurse, or somebody else in that field unless a target is somehow sedated by a  knowledgeable person who implants the microchip. Those cases have indeed  occurred.

Since syringes are generally used for the  implantations, nurses are particularly suspect in committing that crime. If a  doctor, nurse, or another member of the medical profession would implant a  microchip in a patient, he would also probably not hesitate, if given orders, to  inject that patient with live cancer cells, Hepatitis C, or AIDS. That, of  course, does not mean that every doctor and nurse engages in that sordid  practice.

I got a letter in early 2010 from the mother of a  victim in Scotland who stated that her son was implanted with a microchip while  he was in jail. He could later feel the lump where the microchip had been  implanted. For months he suffered relentless electronic and neurological  attacks. A local doctor later saw the microchip on his scanners and removed it.  The victim instantly improved. Afterward, the doctor refused to discuss it with  the victim and his mother, telling them that he found nothing.

Targets require some object, substance, or  characteristic in their body that will attract frequencies used by their remote  attackers. Otherwise, if the electronic and mind control assault is delivered  along a frequency, how does the effect distinguish that particular person? A  target can receive vibrations while in the presence of other people without the  others feeling it. Certain voice inflections and tones of narrators on TV also  cause jolts in a target’s body without others sitting nearby feeling them.  Something on or about the victim’s body has to act as the receiver for some  device that delivers those effects.

Whales, dolphins, sharks, migratory birds, endangered  animal species, and other animals, fowl, and reptiles have been fitted with  microchips for many years to trace their migratory patterns and monitor their  vital signs. If the animals’ blood pressure and other body functions can be  monitored by remote, they can also be manipulated by remote. If animals can be “tagged,” humans can also be tagged.

The microchip has been around since the 1970s. Since  then, many versions of microchips have been invented and manufactured. One such  microchip was invented by Peter Seth Edelstein of Menlo Park, CA and Benjamin  Theodore Nordell II of San Mateo, CA and patented on September 5, 2006 under the  name Method and Apparatus for Locating and Tracking Persons (Patent No. US  7,102,508 B2).

The patent was sold by the inventors to Persephone,  Inc. of Menlo Park, CA. Interestingly, my online search for Persephone turned up  very little on that company. It very well may be only a front for Department of  Defense contractors who carry out experiments and invent and improve gadgets for  the DOD. At any rate, it is not a highly visible organization.

Although the ostensible purpose of the above patented “device” is to locate and track persons who are lost or kidnapped, it lends  itself to many more devious and sinister purposes. Descriptions of patents of  this type are purposely made very vague; however, reading between the lines, we  can glean the following information about that particular patent as it relates  to targeted individuals.

–  the “device” is indeed a microchip;

–  the microchip can be implanted in virtually every  part of the human body, even in   body cavities (use your imagination);

the microchips serve as both transmitters and  receivers;
those microchips are encased in a substance that  does not irritate the flesh  around them;
– the remote operators [the handlers] use a handheld  device, probably a small radio or a cell phone, that in conjunction with cell  phone towers “activates” the microchips;

– the users, or handlers, also communicate with each  other by cell phone;

– the users do not have to be physically present in  a single location to coordinate  their efforts but can instead use “conference  calls from various locations;”

– the microchips CAN be shut off by the initiators;

– the microchip lasts indefinitely, as it can be  continually recharged;

– the microchip’s software can indeed see the  target’s body and even the organs  inside his body;

– the microchip can be programmed with a vast variety  of software that renders many of the physical and neurological effects (the  voices, etc.) experienced by targets;

– those effects can be programmed to occur whenever  the programmer wishes;

– users/operators of the microchip can monitor  several targets at the same time by  remote.

Distance was not mentioned in the patent. In the  drawing that accompanied the patent, communication is depicted by three cell  phone-looking towers. Patents, however, are often written in a vague and  misleading manner, especially those patents that can also be used for unethical,  intelligence, or military purposes. Thus, the communication system shown could  be the triangulation of satellites. The use of satellites would make the patent  workable at any distance. Even regular radio frequencies patched from one area  to another would allow the handlers to operate from a far  distance.

Likewise, the device used to communicate with the  microchip was not mentioned specifically. Although the three towers were shown  in the figure demonstrating how the patent works, the narrative did not state  whether the device was a radio tuner, cell phone, land line phone, or some type  of scanner/radio. Moreover, the radio towers may have represented a  triangulation of satellites.

The microchip’s computer software determines its  effectiveness. By adding new software, the microchip can be adapted by remote to  the target’s evolving situation and change in location. Additional software,  tailored for the particular target, can be introduced into the microchip by  remote at any time. That software can be continually refigured and reprogrammed  as necessary, based on the target’s actions and reactions.

To be used in the human body by remote, microchips  must have a unique identification (ID) such as a symbol, a number, a word, or a  combination of those. There is even some evidence that a target’s DNA profile,  or a distinct part of it, may be inscribed on the microchip. The target’s ID has  to be known and entered into the handler’s device for a match before it can be  contacted by remote. Once the codes are matched on the microchip and the device  used by the handlers, the device’s computer software, without which the device  is useless, acts through contact with the microchip to carry out its various and  many purposes. There must also be a radio frequency to connect the sender to the  receiver, becoming an RFID (radio frequency identification), much like that used  in store scanners at the check-out counters.

The device used by the handler who operates the  device and software must be reasonably small and portable (battery operated).  The name of that device is carefully avoided in the patents; however, it will  probably be a common or perhaps customized cell phone, a small radio or scanner,  laptop computer, or a similar object that has both receiving and transmitting  features. Logically, only one handler has use of the computer that controls all  the functions of the software on the target through the implanted microchip;  otherwise, the computer commands could conflict and negate each other.  Nevertheless, other handlers using those handheld devices can doubtlessly locate  the target using the device.

The trainer manual doubtlessly instructs the handlers  to vary their methods of attack on their targets. Some targets may get the V2K  and no neighborhood stalking; others may outwardly receive only the electronic  effects, i.e. jolts, vibrations, and pin pricks; still others may get a  combination of electronic effects, V2K, and organized physical stalking. That is  totally by design, for if the same technique were used on every target, it would  be far easier to research that technique, develop shielding for it, and possibly  trace it to its origin.

Introduction of the microchip into a target’s body  can be performed in a variety of manners: through shots and inoculations,  through medical procedures, through tiny projectiles (microscopic darts), and  drugging the victim first and then administering the microchip. Apparently many  targets are “tagged” using the latter method. Hypnosis often accompanies the act  so that the target will not remember being drugged.

Although hidden microchips have been recovered from  the bodies of unknowing and involuntary targets, their detection and removal has  proven very difficult, as doctors very reluctantly write orders for the use of  instruments that can detect those microchips. Moreover, today’s microchips are  purposely made too small to detect and with materials designed to conceal them.  Regardless of whatever other device(s) and method(s) might be used to perform  ESMC on involuntary targets, we know that microchips can be and are used for  that purpose.

Most microchips, like implanted medical devices such  as hip replacements and pacemakers, are probably not expected to last beyond a  certain period of time. That argues that targets are implanted with multiple  microchips so that if one stops functioning, another one will continue.  Continuity in electronic stalking and mind control is very  important.

Many targets receive both voices as well as physical  effects from their attackers. There is increasing evidence that the voices and  the physical assaults may stem from two different remote weapons. For example,  in my case I not only receive electronic effects but also get the voices. If the  voices come from an illegally implanted microchip, why did hundreds of holes  appear in sheets of aluminum foil I had placed over my bedroom windows? This  suggests that if indeed microchips are used, they must function in consonance  with the electromagnetism and directed energy weapons.

We have been led to believe that microchips are  cylindrical capsule-looking devices about the size of an oft-quoted “grain of  rice.” That may no longer be true. Today scientists have the capability of  manufacturing a microchip in many forms and shapes and from many substances. A  microchip may now look like a very thin wire no longer than perhaps a quarter of  an inch. Another possible microchip will look like a mole and will probably be  attached to the sub-dermis with very short wires that serve as antennas.  Nano-microchips can also probably be ingested orally.

Microchips have evolved from the traditional,  capsule-like ones often pictured in articles about the Verichip on the internet.  Today microchips take many shapes, forms, and sizes. There is proof that  microchips in the form of tiny darts smaller than a human hair and less than a  quarter of an inch long can be shot into a target from a distance.

I definitely feel that there is at least one  microchip in my body. Some of my symptoms could only come from within the body,  for example, the unusual salivation, the cramps, the gastric disturbances, and  the pin pricks. Those effects can probably be caused only by specialized  software. That software must operate in conjunction with a code from an object  within the body that responds to a computerized command – doubtlessly a  microchip. Let me repeat that despite the many theories, so far ONLY microchips  are PROVEN capable of interacting with victims to produce physical and mental  torture.

In my case, most of the symptoms occur on and around  my head, which leads me to believe that if there is indeed an object in my body  probably located in that region. Here are some of the effects on my head:  tinnitus (ringing in the ears); tops of ears oozing a colorless fluid; sensation  of bubbles popping in mouth; salivating from the mouth at any time; pin pricks  on the eyes and a loss of vision; the top of the nose coating over with a thick  crust; tingling on the skin (as a result a brown spot has appeared on the right  outside nostril and a sore-type depression, on the right side of my chin);  clicking on my head and in my left ear; frequent, long-lasting, pin-like prick  on the back of my neck; the sensation of flies crawling on my face; a  psoriasis-like area on my cheek near the left eye; a very sharp sensation on or  in several teeth (as if a dentist drill had hit a nerve); a heavy pounding,  throbbing in the back of my head; an unnaturally intense itching in the corners  of my eyes and on my eyelids; pin-like pricks in the depths of my ears that  cause me to shudder violently; air that pushes my lips out as if I were snoring  through my mouth; scratching of the throat, which causes either sneezing or  coughing; a tingling inside my nostril that induces sneezing; blockage in my  esophagus that makes it difficult to swallow; constant itching inside my  nostrils that makes me want to “pick” my nose; and of course the voices that  occur in my brain or ears. (More about symptoms later.)

Software and Its Uses for  ESMC

Regardless of how a target is “hooked,” to perform  electronic stalking and mind control on that target requires a computer and  computer software. The software is used for both the electronic, or physical  effects, and the neurological assault. Much of the software utilized can be  bought off the shelves in retail stores. Other software, particularly that used  for neurological assault, is specialized and probably can only be procured by  medical personnel and authorized persons in the military-intelligence-law   enforcement-industrial complex. That computers and software are used for those  purposes strongly argues that targets carry some type of foreign object in their  bodies for them to act upon.

Physical Effects

Everybody has seen movies in which scientists  manipulate radioactive and other devices from behind glass walls with  instruments by remote. Nowadays doctors can do the same thing, except at a much  greater distance. Physicians can monitor and adjust their patients’ heart beat  rate, blood pressure, and other bodily functions by remote over hundreds,  probably thousands of miles. I know a person in south Louisiana whose heart  doctor lives and practices in Houston. Whenever the person experiences an  irregular heartbeat, he simply calls the doctor who then monitors the patient’s  heart using his computer software and adjusts the heartbeat rate by remote. The  doctor’s device must necessarily key in the ID number or symbol on the patient’s  pacemaker to be able to do that.

It is only too logical that the same device that the  physician uses to regulate a heartbeat can also be used to cause the opposite  effect, an irregular heartbeat. My handlers often attempt to interfere with my  normal heartbeat while repeating subliminally, “Heart attack.” Targets call that “faux heart attacks,” or “induced heart attacks.” Many other targets also suffer  from irregular heartbeats caused by their handlers. Those targets only very  rarely wear pacemakers, which argues that they must host some other type of  receiver-transmitter in their body that carries an ID that can connect with  similar software.

In addition to the software that causes faux heart  attacks, the handlers possess software that allows them to cause severe gastric  problems, including the formation of much stomach gas or air on the targets’  stomachs, and to light up the interior of targets’ stomachs, intestines, and  esophagi. I suggest that the handlers employ software used for performing  colonoscopies. Although a doctor who does a colonoscopy operates from nearby,  the device nevertheless operates by remote.

The handlers use software that provides a light that  allows them to view our organs and the inside of our throats and stomachs by  remote. Moreover, the handlers can perform sodomy on targets, as they have on me  and on many of my correspondents both male and female. When that occurs, it  feels exactly like the tube used for the colonoscopy. If a device can function  from a few feet away by remote, what is to prevent its performing that same  function from many miles away?

Doctors also perform eye, nose, and sinus surgery  using computers by remote. Once again, normally the computer and the computer  software are in the same room with the patient. However, it could easily be used  by remote over a great distance. Likewise, hearing technicians who fit hearing  aids check and adjust the hearing by remote. That could be done a thousand miles  away as easily as from the desk in front of the hearing aid recipient.

Prostate problems are often treated by instruments  run off computers using specially designed software. Many male targets complain  that their handlers cause them pain in the groin and cause unnatural erections.  By stimulating parts of the penis or vagina and the colon by remote, the  handlers can cause erections in men and unnatural orgasms in women. Playing with  the targets’ sexual organs by remote is seemingly one of the favorite activities  of the handlers.

There is also various specialized dental software  that allows the user to view the patient’s teeth and mouth in great detail by  remote. Those programs work with x-rays of the patient’s mouth. Dentists  normally use a simple laptop computer for that purpose. I suspect that a  dentist, using the dental records of a particular person, could locate with his  dental software that person wherever he might be. The same type program can be  used with x-rays of any part of the patient’s body, either internal or external.  Many targets complain that their handlers are able to focus on particular teeth  to make them feel like they are being drilled without an anesthesia. Although  that computer software is normally used only a few feet from the patient, it can  also be used from many miles away.